Cases 11 - 20 of 24
REED v. THE GEO GROUP et al
as 3:2018cv00191
Plaintiff:
LOUIS REED, JR
Defendant:
THE GEO GROUP, BLACKWATER RIVER CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, C MAIORANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CADEJUSTE v. MUNTEANU
as 3:2017cv00586
Plaintiff:
GIEUVOIS CADEJUSTE
Defendant:
MUNTEANU, PARTIN, DOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devandal Thomas v. Prison Health Services, Inc., et al
as 15-14341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVANDAL BERNARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., MARSHA NICHOLS, Correctional Nurse, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
DOCTOR v NICHOLS, et al
as 3:2015cv00273
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO J DOCTOR
Defendant:
MARSHA NICHOLS and JIM BURKHARDT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Magwood v. Michael Crews, et al
as 15-12722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY L. MAGWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. CREWS, RICHARD COMERFORD, MARSHA NICHOLS and others
THOMAS v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC et al.
as 3:2015cv00223
Plaintiff:
DEVANDAL BERNARD THOMAS
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC, MARSHA NICHOLS, JULIE JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Magwood v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 15-11215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY L. MAGWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICHARD COMERFORD, MARSHA NICHOLS and others
Bobby Magwood v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 15-10854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY L. MAGWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARSHA NICHOLS, RICHARD COMERFORD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAGWOOD v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00314
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS , RICHARD COMERFORD , MARSHA NICHOLS and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY L MAGWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
