Cases
Banks v. Booher et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff: Marvin Banks and Running River
Defendant: Superintendent Bradley Booher, Head Chaplain Henry Hansard, Tracy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Warden of SCI-Benner Township et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00602
Petitioner: Marvin Banks
Respondent: Warden of SCI-Benner Township, JOSH SHAPIRO and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Warden of SCI-Benner Township et al
as 1:2021cv02171
Petitioner: Marvin Banks
Respondent: Warden of SCI-Benner Township, Josh Shapiro and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Novasel et al
as 1:2020cv01545
Plaintiff: Marvin "Running Rivers" Banks and Marvin Banks
Defendant: Sgt. Novasel and C.O. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Ulli et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01341
Plaintiff: Marvin Banks
Defendant: Michael Wenerowicz and Rev. Ulli Klemm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00427
Defendant: Michael Wenesowicz, Superintendent Marsh, John E. Wetzel and others
Plaintiff: Marvin Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. TUCKER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01445
Plaintiff: MARVIN BANKS
Defendant: S. TUCKER, RYAN SZELEWSKI and CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. KENDRA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00329
Plaintiff: MARVIN BANKS
Defendant: KENDRA, PEGGY, SAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. SHANK et al
as 2:2016cv06504
Plaintiff: MARVIN BANKS
Defendant: MICHAEL SHANK, TOLBERT, FAKOLEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?