Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Smith v. United States Uthinization Order Facility et al
as 1:2023cv03872
Plaintiff:
Brit'tani Michael Smith and Michael Jordan
Defendant:
United States Uthinization Order Facility, Alabama State Police, Mississippi State Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orso et al v. Disner et al
as 1:2021mc20388
Defendant:
Trudy Gilmond, David Kettner, David Sorrells and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Orso as successor trustee to Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court-appointed receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com and Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com
CARLSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv15981
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSILYN MARIE ROSE CARLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv62251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Taser International, Inc. et al v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03108
Plaintiff:
Taser International, Inc. , David Batchelor , Natalie Batchelor and others
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. , Goldman, Sachs & Co. , Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P. and others
Pecial_master:
Henry D. Fellows
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Valdini et al v. KA and KM Development, Inc.
as 6:2009cv00291
Plaintiff:
Ravi Louis Valdini and Mary Rose McDougall
Defendant:
KA and KM Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hollander et al v. KA and KM Development, Inc.
as 6:2008cv02132
Plaintiff:
Stephen Elson, Sheela Indran, William Henry Hiscocks and others
Defendant:
KA and KM Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
