Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gates et al v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gates, Robert Hornsby, Cory Mooney and others
Defendant:
City of Biloxi, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Massey v. Tindell et al
as 3:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
George Massey
Defendant:
Sean Tindell and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Burrough et al v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings et al
as 3:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Brandt Burrough and Brooke Massey
Defendant:
Unknown Driver, Fictitious Defendants "A," "B," and "C" and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Massey
as 1:2021cv00017
Defendant:
Brenda Massey
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. Massey et al
as 3:2020cv00610
Defendant:
Jill D. Massey and Bobbi Thomasson
Plaintiff:
Jarret Montez Wilson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlisle v. AGCO Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00384
Defendant:
Does 1-10, AGCO Corporation and AGCO Corporation f/k/a and d/b/a Massey Ferguson
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Jeanette Carlisle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Soterra LLC v. Neal et al
as 3:2019cv00720
Defendant:
Lamar Neal and Ronnie Massey
Plaintiff:
Soterra LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv00705
Defendant:
Johnathan White, Hussein Kammona, Danielle Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
