Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Breedlove et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
Harrison Breedlove, Haakon Brekke, Connor Smith and others
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor Hill, John or Jane Does 1-20, Clayton County, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marquez v. Gallup Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00956
Plaintiff:
Mr. Anthony Marquez
Defendant:
Gallup Police Department, City of Gallup, Clarissa Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
GRAHAM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17270
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MATTHEW GRAHAM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRAHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv13183
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv09065
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN MATTHEW GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM v. TRIUMPH AEROSTRUCTURES, LLC
as 2:2020cv14241
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW GRAHAM
Defendant:
TRIUMPH AEROSTRUCTURES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
GRAHAM v. TRIUMPH AEROSTRUCTURES, LLC
as 2:2020cv14240
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW GRAHAM
Defendant:
TRIUMPH AEROSTRUCTURES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
GRAHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv60824
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv48754
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neva Muhlenberg v. City of Woodstock, et al
as 20-11658
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY COWAN, CITY OF WOODSTOCK, DALE MUHLENBERG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEVA LENT MUHLENBERG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
