Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Maurice v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01887
Plaintiff:
Craig Maurice
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Raines et al v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
James A. Raines and Larisa Raines
Defendant:
Ronald Maurice LeBlanc and Kuhnle Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Elston v. Prospect Airport Services Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv12388
Plaintiff:
Alean Elston
Defendant:
Prospect Airport Services Inc., Maurice Sims, Kyle Curtiss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Boyd et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01419
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYD and WILLETTE BOYD
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. Gibbs et al
as 2:2022cv12668
Plaintiff:
Maurice Gibbs
Defendant:
Michigan Unemployment Agency and Julia Dale
Rasmussen et al v. Davol et al
as 1:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
MAURICE RASMUSSEN and RISSIA MONIQUE RASMUSSEN
Defendant:
Davol and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01196
Plaintiff:
Maurice Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roach v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04252
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ROACH
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hemmelgarn et al v. Banner et al
as 3:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance, KLLM Transportation Services, LLC and Nickeynon Maurice Banner
Plaintiff:
Beth Hemmelgarn and Scott A Hemmelgarn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bey v. Raque et al
as 3:2020cv00793
Defendant:
Trevor Ford, Walter Sholar, Jennifer E. Porter and others
Plaintiff:
Nazir Abdullah Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
