Cases 1 - 10 of 219
Francis v. Sandoval
as 1:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
David Francis
Defendant:
Maurice Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Sexual Harrassment
Kelly et al v. Groupe
as 1:2023cv03540
Plaintiff:
Latesha Kelly and maurice kelly
Defendant:
Lisa timbillah and Riegel Groupe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv03237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Austin v. Ally Servicing, LLC. et al
as 8:2023cv03007
Plaintiff:
Da'Vone Maurice Austin
Defendant:
Ally Servicing, LLC., CarMax, E.T.C. Recovery and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Johnson v. Day et al
as 1:2023cv02962
Plaintiff:
Maurice Albert Johnson
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day, Judge Peter J. Messitte, John Chamble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McFadden v. Kijakazi et al
as 8:2023cv02456
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. McFadden
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Maurice A. Perry, Raghav Kotval and others
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Burton Sr. v. Schrum
as 1:2023cv02244
Plaintiff:
Duane Maurice Burton, Sr.
Defendant:
Ms. Tracy R. Schrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv02167
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Teneill Wilson, Brandy Stocksdale and Johnathan Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Holbrook v. USA-2255
as 1:2023cv01899
Petitioner:
Eric Maurice Holbrook, Jr.
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
