Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Archer v. Supreme Court of the State of Montana et al
as 2:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Maurice Ronald Archer
Defendant:
Supreme Court of the State of Montana and Mike McGrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Archer v. Supreme Court of the State of Montana et al
as 2:2022cv00083
Petitioner:
Maurice Ronald Archer
Respondent:
Supreme Court of the State of Montana and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. USA
as 1:2020cv00161
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Maurice Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Hambro et al
as 1:2019cv00117
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Richard Maurice Hambro and Richard D. Hambro
Plaintiff:
Steven Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Archer v. Lemons
as 4:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
Maurice Ronald Archer
Defendant:
Fred Lemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archer et al v. Fox et al
as 4:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
Maurice Ronald Archer
Defendant:
Timothy Fox, Mike McGrath and County Attorneys, County and Municipal Magistrates, and the State District Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Billings Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
William Maurice Smith
Defendant:
Billings Police Department, Travis Knecht and Rusty L. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. City of Chinook Police Department et al
as 4:2015cv00060
Plaintiff:
Maurice Mitchell
Defendant:
City of Chinook Police Department, Blaine County Attorney's Office, Blaine County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archer v. Berkebile
as 4:2015cv00051
Petitioner:
Maurice Ronald Archer
Respondent:
David Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maurice v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 9:2014cv00059
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Plaintiff:
Hankey Maurice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
