Cases 11 - 20 of 218
Washington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01455
Plaintiff:
Maurice C. Washington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Boyd et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01419
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYD and WILLETTE BOYD
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kenney v. Bates et al
as 3:2023cv00405
Petitioner:
Maurice D. Kenney
Respondent:
Julia Bates and Judge Ruth Ann Franks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neal El v. Tischler
as 3:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Maurice Neal El
Defendant:
Beth A. Tischler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kenney v. Bates et al
as 3:2022cv01923
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Kenney
Defendant:
Julia R. Bates and Judge Ruth Ann Franks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rasmussen et al v. Davol et al
as 1:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
MAURICE RASMUSSEN and RISSIA MONIQUE RASMUSSEN
Defendant:
Davol and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Villard et al
as 4:2022cv01092
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Jeff Villard, Tyler Evans, Jason Fantone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenney et al v. City Of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Maurice Kenney, Quinn Moore, Mary Zeiser and others
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati, Mayor John Cranley, City Manager Patrick Duhaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Ali Bey v. McCandless
as 1:2022cv00554
Plaintiff:
Maurice Marbury Elohim Ali Bey
Defendant:
Officer McCandless, Kellie Thomson, Cary Pardee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
