Cases 21 - 30 of 364
Davis v. USA
as 3:2022cv02783
Petitioner:
Maurice Lamont Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Grace et al v. Texmex Rainey, LLC
as 1:2022cv01240
Plaintiff:
Elijah Grace and Maurice Porter, Jr.
Defendant:
Texmex Rainey, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Trevino v. Bastrop County, et al.
as 1:2022cv01204
Plaintiff:
Michael Vallejo Trevino
Defendant:
Bastrop County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Maurice Cook, Ms. P O'Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1131 ca Federal Question: Federal Communications Act
Martin v. Live Oak County Jail
as 2:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neal Martin
Defendant:
Live Oak County Jail, Daniel Coban Barton, Jailer Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02435
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mason v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Maurice Henry Mason
Defendant:
Bill E. Waybourn, Tarrant County Sheriff, Mr. Iceom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2022cv00913
Petitioner:
Maurice Henry Mason
Respondent:
Bill E. Waybourn and Tarrant County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Harris County Jailer et al
as 4:2022cv03316
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Harris County Jailer and Sgt T. Akidin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
