Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Johnson, Maurice v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Maurice M Johnson, Jr. and Maurice M. Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Wiliams v. Dahl et al
as 2:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Tyler Dahl, D Jacobs, Jennifer Staffaroni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wierzchowski et al
as 2:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Matthew J Wierzchowski and Lillion Weatherby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Victoria et al
as 2:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Maurice Antonio Parker
Defendant:
Nurse Victoria, Lt Akora and CO Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2023cv00206
Petitioner:
Maurice D Stokes
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Chatman
as 3:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Maurice Collins
Defendant:
Lt Chatman
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Chatman
as 2:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Maurice Collins
Defendant:
Lt Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrold v. Cornerstone Composites Inc
as 2:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
Maurice Harrold
Defendant:
Cornerstone Composites Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mathis v. Buesgen
as 2:2022cv00552
Petitioner:
Maurice M Mathis
Defendant:
Warden Christopher Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
