Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Craig Wilson, et al v. Mark Williams, et al
as 20-3547
Petitioner:
MAXIMINO NIEVES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRAIG WILSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ERIC BELLAMY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, in his official capacity as the Federal Bureau of Prisons Director and MARK WILLIAMS, in his official capacity as Warden of Elkton Federal Correctional Institution
Craig Wilson, et al v. Mark Williams, et al
as 20-3447
Petitioner:
MAXIMINO NIEVES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRAIG WILSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ERIC BELLAMY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, In his official capacity as the Federal Bureau of Prisons Director and MARK WILLIAMS, In his official capacity as Warden of Elkton Federal Correctional Institution
Amicus Curiae:
CURRENT AND FORMER ELECTED LOCAL PROSECUTORS, PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS EXPERTS, DISABILITY RIGHTS OHIO and others
Wilson et al v. Williams et al
as 4:2020cv00794
Petitioner:
Craig Wilson, Kendal Nelson, Eric Bellamy and others
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal and Warden Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nieves v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2019cv01966
Respondent:
Warden FCI Elkton
Petitioner:
Maximino Nieves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NIEVES v. WARDEN, FCI ELKTON
as 2:2019cv17211
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI ELKTON
Petitioner:
MAXIMINO NIEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NIEVES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03545
Petitioner:
MAXIMINO NIEVES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Maximino Nieve
as 08-4738
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAXIMINO NIEVES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
