Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Flynn v. O' Malley
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Vincent Flynn
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Maxwell v. Safeway Inc.
as 8:2022cv03036
Plaintiff:
Tawanna Maxwell
Defendant:
Safeway and Safeway Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Fadness et al
as 1:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
Laura Maxwell, Riley Fadness and Peterson Laura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beckwitt v. Montgomery County et al
as 8:2020cv02639
Defendant:
Maryland Montgomery County, Anne Arundel County Maryland, Amanda Kraemer and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis Beckwitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sprowl et al v. Marriott International, Inc.
as 8:2018cv03691
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Philip S. Friedman, James Sprowl, Kia Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Ryidu-X v. Doe et al
as 1:2018cv02641
Defendant:
Ofc. Jones, Sgt. Wilson, Lieutenant Atkins and others
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ryidu-X v. Foxwell
as 1:2018cv02213
Plaintiff:
Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X
Defendant:
Warden Foxwell
Consolidated Defendant:
Lt. Atkins, Chaplain Felton, OFC. Jones and others
Interested Party:
Attorney Generals Office of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
