Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dickerson v. Fortenberry et al
as 3:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant:
Dewitt Fortenberry, Stacy Jones, Shannon Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amos et al v. Hall et al
as 4:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wilson, Charles Gayles, Phillip Decarlos Webster and others
Defendant:
Pelicia E. Hall, Marshal Turner and Tommy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burrell v. Randolph et al
as 3:2019cv00550
Defendant:
Judge David Ishee, Judge Robert Chamberlin, Judge Josiah Coleman and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Freddie Burrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Randolph et al
as 4:2018cv00142
Defendant:
James D. Maxwell, Michael K. Randolph and James W. Kitchens
Plaintiff:
Bildrick Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Maxwell v. Banks et al
as 5:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Maxwell
Defendant:
Jacquelyn Banks and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craig v. Ishee et al
as 3:2016cv00804
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Craig
Defendant:
P. J. Ishee, Unknown Irving, Unknown Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphrey v. Murry et al
as 4:2010cv00132
Plaintiff:
Omar Khayyam Humphrey
Defendant:
Ruby Murry, Ann Armstrong, Correctional Investigation Department Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Maxwell
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Immigration Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maxwell v. United States et al
as 5:2010cv00151
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Maxwell
Defendant:
United States and Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maxwell v. Hininger et al
as 5:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Maxwell
Defendant:
Damon Hininger, Vance Laughlin, Unknown Slavens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
