Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
McMahan et al v. Rheem Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2013cv00046
Plaintiff: Justin McMahan and Danielle Bissell
Defendant: Rheem Manufacturing Company, Emerson Climate Technologies Incorporated, RegO Goddard Products / ECI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Maytag Corporation, et al v. International Union, etc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2931
Plaintiff - Appellee: Maytag Corporation, a subsidiary of Whirpool Corporation and Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant - Appellant: International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America and United Automobile Workers Local 997
Defendant: Henry Vanderheiden, Jr., Daniel Stock, Lyle Ettleson and others
Maytag Corporation, et al v. UAW, et al
as 10-8020
Respondent: Maytag Corporation and Whirlpool Corporation
Petitioner: International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America and United Automobile Workers Local 997
Bivens v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00219
Plaintiff: Barbara A. Bivens
Defendant: Whirlpool Corporation and Maytag Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 5:2010mc00016
Plaintiff: LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics Monterrey Mexico, S.A., de, C.V.
Defendant: Whirlpool Corporation, Whirlpool Patents Company, Whirlpool Manufacturing Corporation and others
Counter Claimant: Whirlpool Corporation, Whirlpool Patents Company, Whirlpool Manufacturing Corporation and others
Counter Defendant: LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics Monterrey Mexico, S.A., de, C.V.
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 287 Petition to Enforce INS Subpoena
LG Electronics Inc v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 4:2010mc00013
Plaintiff: LG Electronics Inc
Defendant: Whirlpool Corporation and Maytag Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Maytag Corporation v. United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al
as 4:2008cv00291
Plaintiff: Maytag Corporation and Maytag Corporation
Defendant: United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, United Automobile Workers Local 997, Henry Vanderheiden, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Anderson v. Maytag Corporation
as 4:2007cv00468
Defendant: Maytag Corporation
Plaintiff: Susan Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1149 Recover Pension & Profit Sharing
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v Maytag Corporation
as 4:2007mc00025
Petitioner: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent: Maytag Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?