Cases 1 - 10 of 26
MCADAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00580
Lead Plaintiff:
MS ARLENE MCADAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ARLENE MCADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCADAMS v. WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2022cv00247
Petitioner:
TREMARCUS RAYVON MCADAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCADAMS v. PHILADELPHIA NAVAL YARD et al
as 2:2022cv02087
Plaintiff:
MS ARLENE MCADAMS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA NAVAL YARD, PHILADELPHIA NAVY YARD ASSOCIATES, SMITH,DEMARCO & COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BRODT v. ANWORTH MORTGAGE ASSET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv00981
Defendant:
ANWORTH MORTGAGE ASSET CORPORATION, DOMINIQUE MIELLE, JOE E. DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BRODT
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
MCADAMS v. BURWELL et al
as 2:2020cv01905
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ALFRED D. MCADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCADAMS et al v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2017cv01427
Plaintiff:
MARY MCADAMS and DAVID J. MCADAMS
Defendant:
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MCADAMS v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv01746
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. MCADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PHILLIP v. MCADAMS et al
as 2:2016cv03775
Plaintiff:
RAHIM PHILLIP
Defendant:
ELIZABETH MCADAMS, KAREN PRECHTEL and DOUGLAS PRECHTEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCADAMS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00798
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM MCADAMS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
