Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rivero v. Child Support of Medford, OR et al
as 1:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Anthony Rivero
Defendant:
Child Support of Medford, OR and D.A. Mathew McCauley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCauley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Kandi McCauley
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Emanuel Displaced Persons Association 2 et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01896
Defendant:
Prosper Portland, City of Portland, Portland Development Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Displaced Persons Association 2, Gloria Campbell-Cash, Isaac Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00227
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01554
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act Discrimination
Castaneda et al v. TRG Customer Solutions
as 6:2010cv06153
Plaintiff:
Pamela Castaneda and Pamela McCauley
Defendant:
TRG Customer Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bowers et al v. Whitman et al
as 1:2009cv03082
Plaintiff:
Jon Bowers, Lynna Bowers, A.L. Bruner and others
Defendant:
Richard Whitman and State of Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCauley v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv06123
Plaintiff:
John McCauley
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
IN RE: AUSA APPOINTMENTS EXTENSIONS TERMINATIONS
as 3:2007mc09007
Plaintiff:
James E. Alexander, David J. Adler, Daphne Banay and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
