Cases 1 - 10 of 278
McCoy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00985
Petitioner:
James McCoy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. v. Blackwells Capital LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc.
Defendant:
Blackwells Capital LLC, Blackwells Onshore I LLC, Blackwells Holding Co LLC and others
McCoy v. Saunders
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
James McCoy
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Saunders
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
James McCoy
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
James McCoy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barton v. Barry
as 5:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Tim McCoy Barton
Respondent:
Waylon Barry Warden and Waylon Barry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
McCoy v. McCoy, et al.
as 4:2023cv01073
Defendant:
Martha McCoy, Lena McCoy, Steven Craig McCoy doing business as The Real McCoy Team and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald McCoy doing business as The Real McCoys International Realty Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Cooley et al v. Texas Custom Builder et al
as 6:2023cv00765
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cooley, Joshua Bailey, Juan Guerrero and others
Defendant:
Texas Custom Builder, George Perry, JMI Contractors, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
