Cases 1 - 10 of 41
DAVIS v. SCI FOREST
as 2:2023cv01366
Plaintiff:
GARY DAVIS
Defendant:
JUDGE DONNA JO MCDANIEL, MAGISTRATE JUDGE KIM HOOTS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHELSIE PRATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: McDaniels
as 1:2023cv01025
Plaintiff:
Brandon McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIELS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MCDANIELS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kimmel v. Doughty et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Davey James Kimmel
Defendant:
C.O. Doughty, C.O. Torres, C.O. McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIELS v. STARKS et al
as 1:2022cv01816
Plaintiff:
Brandon Mcdaniels
Defendant:
c/o Starks, c/o Rasheed, SCI-Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIELS v. STARKS et al
as 2:2022cv04396
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MCDANIELS
Defendant:
C/O STARKS, C/O RASHEED and SCI-DALLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF RECORDS et al
as 2:2022cv01270
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HENDERSON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF RECORDS, MICHAEL MCGEEVER, SAM HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ANGLE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant:
LT. SMITH, LT. FROEHLICH, CO1 GUYTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MCDANIEL v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv00738
Petitioner:
GLENN MCDANIEL
Respondent:
JAMIE SORBER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
