Cases 1 - 10 of 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McDaniel v. USA
as 7:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
Michael James McDaniel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Clay v. Matagorda County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
James McDaniel Clay
Defendant:
Matagorda County Jail, Officer Cox, Matagorda County Jail Facility Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Matagorda County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
James McDaniel Clay
Defendant:
Matagorda County Jail, Officer Cox, Matagorda County Jail Facility Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Lori McDaniel
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Wal-Mart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
