Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McKenzie v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Cleatus Ray McKenzie
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Moffett v. Jones County Court System et al
as 2:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Rodger Moffett
Defendant:
Jones County Court System, Others Currently Unknown, Jones County Chancery Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00168
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McKenzie et al v. Cook et al
as 2:2019cv00196
Defendant:
City of Columbia, Mississippi, Andrew Reid, Nathan Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Myjellious McKenzie and Monica McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mehta v. Premier Entertainment Biloxi, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00251
Defendant:
Duncan McKenzie, Brandon McCory, Dwight Savell and others
Plaintiff:
Kirti Mehta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patterson v. City of McComb, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00344
Plaintiff:
Zachary Patterson
Defendant:
City of McComb, Mississippi , Scott McKenzie , Rodney Nordstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Funches v. McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
Henry Funches
Defendant:
McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc. and Kevin Evert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
