Civil Rights Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Derrick Oakes v. Kathy Danhof, et al
as 17-1010
Plaintiff - Appellant: DERRICK L. OAKES, SR.
Defendant - Appellee: KATHY DANHOF, MDOC Parole Agent, KATHY MAYER, MDOC Parole Agent, DEBORAH VISGER, MDOC Sec "GC" and others
Amira Salem, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 15-1694
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: AMIRA SALEM and KESHUNA ABCUMBY
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director at MDOC, THOMAS G. FINCO, Deputy Director MDOC and others
Amira Salem, et al v. MDOC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1598
Plaintiff - Appellee: AMIRA SALEM and KESHUNA ABCUMBY
Defendant - Appellant: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director at MDOC, THOMAS G. FINCO, Deputy Director MDOC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv12314
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martinique Stoudemire v. Michigan Department of Correct, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1588
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARTINIQUE STOUDEMIRE
Defendant - Appellant: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Warden, Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections, GEORGE J. PRAMSTALLER, D.O., MDOC Chief Medical Officer and others
Defendant: JAN EPP, MDOC Regional Health Care Administrator, et al
Smith v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00269
Plaintiff: Ralph E. Smith, Jr.
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections, Richard Jenkins, Mike Sulski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oakes v. VanDeusen et al
as 1:2007fp00678
Plaintiff: Derrick L. Oakes
Defendant: Leslie A. VanDeusen, Dennis Vennema, Kathy Danhof and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?