Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Meade v. Hernandez
as 1:2022cv02908
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Meade
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Jeffco Sheriff's Office, Jefferson County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton-Ashley v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01520
Plaintiff:
Octavia Patton-Ashley
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Mead Johnson & Company LLC and Mead Johnson Nutrition Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Torres et al v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Company et al
as 1:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
Jessica Torres, Jessica (I) Torres, Michael Lamorie and others
Defendant:
Mead Johnson Nutrition Company and Mead Johnson & Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Core Progression Franchise LLC v. Mead et al
as 1:2021cv01049
Defendant:
Altru Fitness COS LLC, Mytchell Mead, Altru Fitness LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Core Progression Franchise LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Handy v. Knight et al
as 1:2021cv00462
Defendant:
O'Brien, Mike Mead and Knight
Plaintiff:
Wyatt T. Handy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meads v. Mountain States Casing Company, LLC
as 1:2019cv01707
Defendant:
Mountain States Casing Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
alan meads
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Meads v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2019cv00309
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Marlar and James Falk
Plaintiff:
Alan Meads
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cross River Bank v. Meade
as 1:2017cv00832
Plaintiff:
Cross River Bank
Defendant:
Julie Ann Meade
Interested_party:
Marlette Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
WebBank v. Meade
as 1:2017cv00786
Plaintiff:
WebBank
Defendant:
Julie Ann Meade
Interested_party:
Marlette Funding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
