Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Chandler v. DeJoy, et al.
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. CHANDLER
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service and MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Former Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service
Maurice Glover v. Lee Thompson, et al
as 22-1785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICE GLOVER
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE A. THOMPSON, individually and in his offical capacity as former District Manager of the United States Postal Office, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Individually and in her official capacity as Former Postmaster General/Chief Executive Officer and others
Moore v. DeJoy
as 22-1152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Murdise Moore
Defendant / Appellee:
Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Patricia Henry, Aida Santana-Putter and others
Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes, et al
as 22-55496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINE SAWICKY
Defendant / Appellee:
TAO SYKES, Manuel Real Beneficiary, PERCY ANDERSON, PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ and others
Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes et al
as 2:2021cv09023
Plaintiff:
Christine Sawicky
Defendant:
Tao Sykes, Percy Anderson, Philip S. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962
Allen v. USPS
as 21-30699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marc S. Allen, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Postal Service, Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General
Jose Centeno v. Louis Dejoy, et al
as 21-4005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE A. CENTENO
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LOUIS DEJOY, Post Master General and others
Kye Chung v. Megan Brennan
as 21-16564
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYE CHUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, U.S. Postmaster General
Daniel Thibeault v. Megan Brennan
as 21-55777
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL THIBEAULT
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General
Ford v. Brennan
as 21-4086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD O. FORD
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
