Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Schick v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv00707
Defendant:
Wayne Schick, FBI, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Allen Schick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lysenko et al v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
ANTON LYSENKO and KATERYNA SYDORENKO
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Director UR M JADDOU, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Dearborn Market et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Dearborn Market 601 Dearborn Avenue Dayton, Ohio, NDA Market, Inc. and Dearborn Market
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Merrick Garland, Secretary Tom Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 601 USDA Condemnation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
