Cases 11 - 19 of 19
MOORE v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2011cv00735
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EVERETTE MOORE
Defendant:
SHERRY MAE BRYANT , AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Formy-Duval v. Interroll Corp. et al
as 7:2010cv00079
Plaintiff:
Paul Formy-Duval
Defendant:
Interroll Corp., Richard Keely, Nicole R. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
CURTIS v. MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH, INC.
as 1:2009cv00740
Plaintiff:
CAROL CURTIS
Defendant:
MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
KASTEL et al v. NUVEEN INVESTMENTS INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00646
Plaintiff:
HOWARD L. KASTEL and JOAN H. KASTEL
Defendant:
NUVEEN INVESTMENTS INC., ROBERT P. BREMNER, MESIROW FINANCIAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Loney v. National City Bank et al
as 5:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
Chace H. Loney
Defendant:
National City Bank, Merrill Lynch, Home Loans and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services Inc. v. First Care Medical Clinic, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00516
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services Inc.
Defendant:
First Care Medical Clinic, Inc. and BENEDICT OKWARA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services, Inc. v. Cobb et al
as 5:2007cv00129
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher Cobb, Graclyn Goldstein, Jeffrey Hanretty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
