Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Garba v. Houston Methodist Hospital
as 4:2024cv01658
Plaintiff:
Zainabu Garba
Defendant:
Houston Methodist Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Jones v. Methodist Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
James H Jones
Defendant:
Methodist Hospital, District Attorney's Office, Roy Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trinh v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation
as 4:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation, Ted Smith, Robert Hambleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Sweat et al v. Houston Methodist Hospital
as 4:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
Edward Sweat and Marie Garza Sweat
Defendant:
Houston Methodist Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas v. Becerra
as 4:2023cv04799
Plaintiff:
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast, Ascension Providence, Ascension Seton d/b/a Ascension Seton Hays and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Jones v. Methodist Hospital et al
as 4:2023cv04619
Plaintiff:
James H Jones
Defendant:
Methodist Hospital and District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
