Cases 1 - 8 of 8
INCLINE CASUALTY COMPANY v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv02120
Plaintiff:
INCLINE CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
MELVIN L. DAVIS, M&D FAMILY TRANSPORT, LLC, METROLINA GREENHOUSES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
TAWADROS et al v. SINGH et al
as 1:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
MINA TAWADROS and ENGY SAMAAN
Defendant:
MANPREET SINGH, MG TRANS EXPRESS and R. DEEP TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEARING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. MG DEVELOPMENT AMERICA, INC
as 2:2017cv01138
Plaintiff:
HEARING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
MG DEVELOPMENT AMERICA, INC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PHILADELPHIA REGIONAL LIMOUSINE ASSOCIATION et al v. THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 5:2016cv05625
Plaintiff:
PHILADELPHIA REGIONAL LIMOUSINE ASSOCIATION , NEW RHOADS TRANSPORTATION INC. , RHOADS LIMOUSINE SERVICE, INC. and others
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY and VINCENT J. FENERTY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHECKER CAB PHILADELPHIA, INC. et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07265
Plaintiff:
CHECKER CAB PHILADELPHIA, INC. , AF TAXI, INC. , AG TAXI, INC. and others
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TRAVIS KALANICK, JON FELDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
CLAUDIO v. MGS MACHINE CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv04378
Plaintiff:
JORGE CLAUDIO
Defendant:
MGS MACHINE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
AGOSTO et al v. MG SYSTEMS & WELDING, INC.
as 5:2007cv05194
Plaintiff:
JUAN J. AGOSTO, JR. and NANCY N. AGOSTO
Defendant:
MG SYSTEMS & WELDING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. MG CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00674
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
MG CONSTRUCTION, INC. and MARIE SCIULLI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
