Cases 1 - 10 of 65
DICKSON v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS LLC
as 5:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Shicala Dickson
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS LLC and CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
ROBINSON v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC
as 4:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ROBINSON
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC and MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
FRAZIER v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
DENISE FRAZIER
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS LLC doing business as CENTURION PROFESSIONALS and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ADAMS v. SCHROCK et al
as 3:2023cv03882
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ADAMS
Defendant:
JOSEPH SCHROCK, MICHAEL TONA, CENTURION OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv01221
Plaintiff:
Elmer Williams
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Centurion of Florida, LLC, MHM Health Professionals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
