Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cherry v. Meyers et al
as 2:2023cv00879
Plaintiff: Michael Tyrone Cherry, Jr.
Defendant: Freddrick Meyers and Officer Baiel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry v. Myers et al
as 2:2021cv00699
Plaintiff: Michael Tyrone Cherry, Jr.
Defendant: Frederick Myers and FNU Baiel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Tyrell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00208
Defendant: Justice Michael A. Cherry, Charles Thompson, Tao and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15918
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00162
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
John Arpino v. Michael Cherry, et al
as 18-15616
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL A. CHERRY, MARK GIBBONS, JAMES W. HARDESTY and others
Marcelli v. Hardesty et al
as 3:2014cv00606
Defendant: Michael A. Cherry, Michael L. Douglas and James W. Hardesty
Plaintiff: Anthony Michael Marcelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Michael Cherry We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-6198
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL ANTHONY CHERRY
Cherry v. Correct Care Solutions et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00628
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Cherry
Defendant: Correct Care Solutions, Lois LNU and Karla LNU
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry v. Aramark Co. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00629
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Cherry
Defendant: Aramark Co., FNU Platt and T. Barie
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?