Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Official Committee of Talc ClaimantsIn re: Official Committee of Talc Claimants
as 23-1826
Petitioner:
In re: OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF TALC CLAIMANTS
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. KAPLAN and LTL MANAGEMENT LLC
Lynn Smith v. Andrea Dobin, et al
as 20-1614
Defendant / Appellee:
ELI HALTOVSKY, HONORABLE ANNE E. THOMPSON, HONORABLE MICHAEL B. KAPLAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNN Z. SMITH
Defendant:
FIVE STAR SERVICES LLC
KARAGJOZI et al v. FAIELLA et al
as 3:2019cv14520
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GEYER and ZUDI KARAGJOZI
Defendant:
DAVID BRUCK, ESQ., Greenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis LLC, MICHAEL B. KAPLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
KARAGJOZI et al v. FAIELLA et al
as 3:2019cv14521
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GEYER and ZUDI KARAGJOZI
Defendant:
PERRY MANDARINO, DAVID BRUCK, ESQ., PLAINFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
KARAGJOZI v. KAPLAN
as 1:2019cv10530
Plaintiff:
ZUDI KARAGJOZI
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. KAPLAN
Intervenor:
DAVID BRUCK, ESQ. and Greenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
SMITH v. DOBIN et al
as 2:2018cv17515
Defendant:
ELI HALTOVSKY, HON. ANNE B. THOMPSON, ANDREA DOBIN, ESQ. and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN Z. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH et al v. RABNER et al
as 1:2018cv11483
Defendant:
FORMER ATT. GENERAL ANNE B. MILGRAM, MARK NEARY, ESQ., ATTORNEY GENERAL GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SMITH and LYNN Z. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Jan Marasek, et al
as 13-3328
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JAN MARASEK, JOAN BYRON-MARASEK and THE MARASEK TRUST
Plaintiff - Respondent:
THEODORE LISCINSKI
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL B. KAPLAN
In re: Clinton Barlow & Elmalean Bows, et al
as 13-1063
Petitioner - Petitioner:
In re: CLINTON C. BARLOW and ELMALEAN BOWSER, a/k/a Elmalean Austin
Trustee - Respondent:
ALBERT RUSSO
Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL B. KAPLAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
