Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Nieves v. Parole Department et al
as 4:2021cv00461
Plaintiff:
Luis Nieves
Defendant:
Joseph DuPont, Amanda West, Michael Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITENIGHT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01864
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WHITENIGHT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JOHN/JANE DOE, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv05574
Plaintiff:
CARLSON F. ANDERSON
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL BELL, CYNITHIA LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
Raymond Brown
Defendant:
Jane Doe,, Connie Green, Michael Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Tice et al
as 3:2016cv00609
Plaintiff:
Raymond Brown
Defendant:
Tice, Connie Green and Michael Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILLIAM v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
HUGH JEFFREY GILLIAM
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, KENNETH R. CAMMERON, DEBRA YOUNKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL v. RIDDELL, INC., et al.
as 2:2016cv00393
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BELL
Defendant:
RIDDELL, INC. , ALL AMERICAN SPORTS CORPORATION and RIDDELL SPORTS GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gillespie v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv01973
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Gillespie
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Robin Lewis, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL v. MOONEY et al
as 5:2013cv07345
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL BELL
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SIMMONS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv06354
Plaintiff:
DALTON SIMMONS , RONALD KRAJEWSKI , THOMAS CLAPP, II and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, RIDDELL, INC., ALL AMERICAN SPORTS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
