Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Masoud Bamdad v. USA, et al
as 21-55288
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER, FITZGERALD, Lieutenant, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL LOPEZ, Officer, in his individual and official capacities, DANIEL MORENO, Officer, in his individual and official capacities, VINCENT LEGASPI, Lieutenant , in his individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MASOUD BAMDAD
Moshe Leichner v. Esther Nicholas-Arafiles, et al
as 20-55090
Defendant:
WILLIAM ROSE, DONALD N. RICHETTI, MICHAEL BENOV and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXANDER SINAVSKY, Dr. and ESTHER NICHOLAS-ARAFILES, Dr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MOSHE LEICHNER
Matthew Davies v. Michael Benov
as 15-17256
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW ROWAN DAVIES
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL BENOV
Amicus Curiae:
MARK LENO, California Senator (SD-11) and LONI HANCOCK, California Senator (SD-09)
Matthew Davies v. Michael Benov
as 15-17256
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW ROWAN DAVIES
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL BENOV
Amicus Curiae:
MARK LENO, California Senator (SD-11) and LONI HANCOCK, California Senator (SD-09)
Hector Lopez v. Benov
as 1:2015cv00490
Petitioner:
Hector Lopez
Respondent:
Michael Benov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davies v. Benov
as 1:2015at00139
Petitioner:
Matthew Rowan Davies
Respondent:
Michael Benov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(HC) Davies v. Benov
as 1:2015cv00275
Defendant:
Benov
Plaintiff:
(HC) Davies
Petitioner:
Matthew Rowan Davies
Respondent:
Warden Michael Benov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Boroumand v. Benov
as 2:2014cv08769
661) 765-3034 (fax:
Michael Benov
661)322-6770 (fax:
Mansour Boroumand
Mansour Boroumand v. Michael Benov
as 2:2014cv08663
Respondent:
Michael Benov and United States of America
Petitioner:
Mansour Boroumand
Olayo-Xochilt v. Benov
as 1:2014cv01485
Petitioner:
Marco Olayo-Xochilt
Respondent:
Michael Benov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
