Cases 31 - 40 of 53
VACTOR v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2016cv00027
Plaintiff:
ROGER TODD VACTOR
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, JASON W. REED, JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2016cv00021
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, PAUL A. ENNIS, ADAMS and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN E. GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOHN v. OVERMYER et al
as 3:2015cv00312
Petitioner:
EDWARD YOHN
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and KATHLEEN G. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv06188
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bartone v. Overmyer et al
as 1:2015cv02142
Petitioner:
Gary Bartone
Respondent:
Michael D. Overmyer, Stefanie J. Salavantis and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TABANSI v. SCI FOREST J-BLOCK RHU ET AL et al
as 1:2015cv00261
Plaintiff:
SEHU KESSA SAA TABANSI
Defendant:
SCI FOREST J-BLOCK RHU ET AL, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, JEFFREY HORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLCOMB v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv05776
Petitioner:
HAROLD HOLCOMB
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WASHINGTON v. OVERMYER
as 1:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YENDELL v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2015cv00166
Petitioner:
RALPH LEE YENDELL
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pugh v. Overmyer et al
as 3:2015cv00727
Petitioner:
Douglas B. Pugh
Respondent:
Michael D. Overmyer and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
