Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Michael Green v. Kiaos Ragsdale
as 23-6218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DUCHELLE GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. KIAOS RAGSDALE
Defendant:
MR. JOSHUA L. SALMON, Administrator
Green v. Hurt
as 7:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Michael Duchelle Green
Defendant:
Miss. Elizabeth Hurt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Michael Duchelle Green
Respondent:
Miss. Elizabeth Hurt and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Green v. Nurse Jones
as 22-7237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DUCHELLE GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE JONES and DOCTOR LIU
Defendant:
NURSE ROGERS
Michael Green v. Kiaos Ragsdale
as 22-7042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DUCHELLE GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. KIAOS RAGSDALE
Defendant:
MR. JOSHUA L. SALMON, Administrator
Green v. Salmon et al
as 7:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Michael Duchelle Green
Defendant:
Mr. Joshua Salmon, Mr. Kiaous Ragsdale, Mr. Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Green v. Municipal Claim
as 22-6922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DUCHELLE GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
MUNICIPAL CLAIM, BLUE RIDGE REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY, MR. JOSHUA L. SALMON, Administrator and others
Green v. Clarke
as 7:2022cv00452
Petitioner:
Michael Duchelle Green
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Municipal Claim et al
as 7:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
Michael Duchelle Green
Defendant:
Municipal Claim, Blue Ridge Regional Jail Auth., Mr. Joshua Salmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. White, et al
as 7:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Michael Duchelle Green
Defendant:
Kimberly White, Ian Beuckeleare and Elizabeth Hurt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
