Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jackson v. Carter, et al.
as 1:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Jackson
Respondent:
Sheriff Tom Carter and Twin Falls County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Newman et al
as 1:2020cv00438
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Jackson
Defendant:
Hughes, Don Newman and 2 Medical Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32319
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDWARD JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Jackson v. USA
as 17-35036
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Jackson v. USA
as 16-73047
Petitioner:
MICHAEL EDWARD JACKSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jackson v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00902
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. Warden of the Federal Transfer Center
as 5:2013cv00141
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Jackson
Respondent:
Warden of the Federal Transfer Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Jackson
as 1:2012cv12328
Respondent:
Michael Edward Jackson
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Certification of Dangerousness Due to Mental Disease or Defect
United States of America v. Michael Edward Jackson
as 1:2011mc91072
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Edward Jackson
Cause Of Action: Certification of Dangerousness Due to Mental Disease or Defect
United States of America v. Michael Edward Jackson
as 1:2011cv10506
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Edward Jackson
Cause Of Action: Certification of Dangerousness Due to Mental Disease or Defect
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
