Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Harssema v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00832
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Harssema
Respondent:
Bryan Williams and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ynostrosa v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00014
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Ynostrosa
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sampson v. Davidson Inventor Service et al
as 6:2019cv00089
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Sampson
Defendant:
Davidson Inventor Service, John Delissio and FNU Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muehlemann v. Lange et al
as 6:2018cv00354
Defendant:
Sheriff Eddie Lange and Bell County Jail
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Muehlemann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muehlemann v. Lange et al
as 4:2018cv04491
Defendant:
Bell County Jail and Sheriff Eddy Lange
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Muehlemann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muehlemann v. Middleton Unit et al
as 1:2018cv00178
Defendant:
Sayle Unit and Middleton Unit
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Muehlemann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conerway v. Fernandez
as 3:2018cv02749
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Conerway
Respondent:
D Fernandez and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Muehlemann v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2018cv03904
Defendant:
R Razo, Director Bryan Collier and Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Muehlemann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Nurse Practitioner
as 7:2018cv00157
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner
Plaintiff:
Michael Ryan and Michael Edward Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salazar v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2016cv00116
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Salazar
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
