Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Forrest v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00787
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, John Wetzel, Superintendant Thomas McGinley and others
Petitioner:
Michael Forrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FORREST v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01496
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, JOHN WETZEL and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FORREST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Forrest v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2020cv00408
Respondent:
Superintendant Thomas McGinley, John Wetzel and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Petitioner:
Michael Forrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FORREST v. BEDELL et al
as 2:2019cv04204
Defendant:
DR. MOCLOCK, TONER, TRISHA KELLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrest v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2017cv01777
Plaintiff:
Michael Forrest
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Theresa Delbalso, B. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrest v. Overmeyer et al
as 3:2014cv00934
Plaintiff:
Michael Forrest
Defendant:
Michael Overmeyer, Michael Tice, Lt. Murin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORREST v. SAUERS
as 3:2013cv00067
Petitioner:
Michael Forrest
Respondent:
Debra K. Sauers, Cert Attack Guards, Staff and Guards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORREST v. SAUERS
as 1:2012cv00318
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FORREST
Respondent:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, CERT ATTACK GUARDS, STAFF AND GUARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORREST v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, MAURIN, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
