Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CADOCHE v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et al
as 1:2018cv01699
Defendant:
THOMAS A. ADAMS, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, NORMAN ST. GEORGE and others
Plaintiff:
GALIQUOGI' DINAH DEAS CADOCHE and BRIDGETTE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koch v. The County of Nassau et al
as 2:2017cv02922
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., Caminetti, Mr. Caminetti and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Koch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petion v. Nassau County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2015cv05770
Defendant:
Cpt. Michael Golio, Martin D. Meaney, Esq., Nassau County Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Rubens Petion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Sposato et al
as 2:2015cv02826
Respondent:
Michael Golio and Michael Sposato
Petitioner:
Derick Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01187
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miller v. County of Nassau
as 12-4373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Miller
Defendant:
Michael J. Sposato, Sheriff, Michael Golio, Captain, Garcia, Inv. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
County of Nassau
Miller v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2012cv04550
Defendant:
County of Nassau, Capt. Michael Golio, Seargent Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2012cv04430
Defendant:
Corr. Officer Barretti, Corr. Officer Bauer, County of Nassau and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
