Cases 31 - 40 of 132
Glover v. Deer Ridge Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2019cv01602
Defendant:
Assistant Director Michael Gower, Mr. Read, Mr. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Darin A. Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sir Giorgio Clardy v. Tracie McFarlane, et al
as 19-35530
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, RONNIE FOSS, CRAIG PRINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIR GIORGIO SANFORD CLARDY
Bjork v. Peters et al
as 6:2019cv00981
Defendant:
Randy Briones, Jamie Breyman, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Bjork
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culley v. Peters et al
as 3:2019cv00926
Defendant:
Rob Persson, Dawnell Meyer, Dr. Christopher DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Culley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Williams v. ODOC, et al
as 19-35404
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL GOWER, Assistant Administrator at ODOC, LEONARD WILLIAMSON, Inspector General at ODOC, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Kenneth Williams v. ODOC, et al
as 19-35405
Defendant / Appellee:
LELAND BEAMER, Dr., ROBERT WHITE, RN, TLC COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Sweeney v. Peters et al
as 3:2019cv00682
Defendant:
Rob Persson, Dawnell Meyer, Dr. Christopher DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Sweeney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brelin v. Peters et al
as 3:2019cv00672
Defendant:
Dr Don Dravis, Dawnell Meyer, Dr. Christopher DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Autumn Brelin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClure v. Peters et al
as 3:2019cv00624
Defendant:
Craig Prins, Branden Kelly, Garrett Laney and others
Plaintiff:
Philip W. McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomes v. Peters et al
as 3:2019cv00573
Defendant:
Dawnell Meyer, Dr. Christopher DiGiulio, Joe DeCamp and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Gomes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
