Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Doe v. Reese, et al.
as 26-973
Plaintiff:
JUNE DOE
Defendant:
MIKE REESE, Director Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC), LEVI D. GRAY, Corrections Officer at CCCF (former), COLETTE PETERS, former Director Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Bjork v. Peters, et al.
as 25-3949
Plaintiff:
CRAIG BJORK
Defendant:
BRANDON KELLY, JAMIE BREYMAN, GREG JONES and others
Bush v. Reese et al
as 6:2025cv00361
Plaintiff:
Jon Louis Bush
Defendant:
Michael Reese, Heidi Steward, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Reese et al
as 3:2024cv02011
Defendant:
Levi D. Gray, Brian Belleque, Mike Reese and others
Plaintiff:
June Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Flores
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Collette Peters, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lobue v. Steward et al
as 6:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Zachary Michael Lobue
Defendant:
Heidi Steward, Colette Peters, Brian Belleque and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Read v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
Lacy Erin Read
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Colette Peters, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Osborne v. Collette Peters, et al
as 22-35663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM FRANK OSBORNE
Defendant / Appellee:
COLLETTE PETERS, ODOC Director, MICHAEL GOWER, ODOC Assistant Director of Operations, MARK NOOTH, ODOC East Side Institution Administrator and others
Pinsky v. Peters et al
as 6:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Pinsky
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Heidi Steward, Michael Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.