Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In re: Ardak Akishev, et al v. Sergey Kapustin, et al
as 16-1095
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ARDAK AKISHEV
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BORIS PARKER, Esq.
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEY KAPUSTIN, IRINA KAPUSTIN, MICHAEL GOLOVERYA and others
EMPIRE UNITED LINES CO., INC. et al v. BALTIC AUTO SHIPPING, INC.
as 2:2015cv00355
Plaintiff:
EMPIRE UNITED LINES CO., INC. and MICHAEL HITRINOV
Defendant:
BALTIC AUTO SHIPPING, INC. and ANDREJUS PRESNIAKOVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Empire United Lines Co., Inc. et al v. SK Imports, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02566
Plaintiff:
Empire United Lines Co., Inc. and Michael Hitrinov
Defendant:
Michael Goloverya, Sergey Kapustin, Irina Kapustina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
AKISHEV et al v. KAPUSTIN et al
as 1:2013cv07152
Plaintiff:
ARDAK AKISHEV , ZHANDOS ALIAKPAROV , ALEXEY BATALOV and others
Defendant:
SERGEY KAPUSTIN, IRINA KAPUSTIN, MICHAEL GOLOVERYA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
OOO "GARANT-S" v. Empire United Lines Co., Inc.
as 13-1685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OOO "GARANT-S"
Defendant - Appellee:
Empire United Lines Co., Inc. and Michael Khitrinov, AKA Michael Hitrinov
Global Auto, Inc. et al v. Hitrinov et al
as 1:2013cv02479
Plaintiff:
Effect Auto Sales, Inc., G Auto Sales, Inc. and Global Auto, Inc.
Defendant:
Empire United Lines Co., Inc., Michael Hitrinov, John Does 1 through 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
BALTIC AUTO SHIPPING, INC. v. HITRINOV et al
as 2:2011cv06908
Plaintiff:
BALTIC AUTO SHIPPING, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL HITRINOV, EMPIRE UNITED LINES CO., INC., MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY(USA), INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
MOTOSTRADA, LLC v. HITRINOV et al
as 2:2008cv03648
Plaintiff:
MOTOSTRADA, LLC
Defendant:
MICHAEL HITRINOV, EMPIRE UNITED LINES CO., INC., CORPORATE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
