Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv02311
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant: MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv02138
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant: MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant: MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00715
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant: MERRICK B. GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00140
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant: MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAHR v. SAPERSTEIN et al
as 1:2020cv00964
Defendant: KARL ROVE, HUDSON INSTITUTE, JAY LEFKOWITZ and others
Plaintiff: EVAN GAHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LADEAIROUS v. LYNCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00954
Plaintiff: JOSEPH MICHAEL LADEAIROUS
Defendant: LORETTA LYNCH and MICHAEL HOROWITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMSON v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv00490
Plaintiff: JEFF H. WILLIAMSON
Defendant: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., MICHAEL HOROWITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LADEAIROUS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01588
Plaintiff: JOSEPH MICHAEL LADEAIROUS
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and MICHAEL HOROWITZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?