Cases 1 - 10 of 13
DENNY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv20080
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J DENNY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DENNIS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2017cv02522
Respondent:
ERIC HOLCOMB, JOE HOGSETT, INDIANAPOLIS CITY COUNTY OF MARION CONSOLIDATED and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Dennis v. P. Lovett, et al
as 15-1314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. DENNIS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN PAIR and P. LOVETT, Sergeant
Michael Dennis v. Stanley Knight
as 14-3383
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. DENNIS
Respondent - Appellee:
STANLEY KNIGHT
DENNIS v. SUPERINTENDENT et al
as 2:2014cv00230
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. DENNIS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNIS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2014cv00150
Respondent:
GREG BALLARD, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, MICHAEL PENCE and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DENNIS v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2014cv00536
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. DENNIS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Dennis v. Parole Officer
as 12-1845
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. DENNIS
Respondent - Appellee:
PAROLE OFFICER
Michael Dennis v. Stanley Knight
as 11-2872
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. DENNIS
Respondent - Appellee:
STANLEY KNIGHT
DENNIS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2011cv00876
Respondent:
COMMUNITY CORRECTION OF AMERICA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, INDIANA PUBLIC DEFENDER BOARD and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
