Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Michael Piskanin, Jr. v. Mark Capozzi
as 19-1005
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK CAPOZZI, Individually and as Superintendent
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
PISKANIN v. CAPOZZI
as 2:2018cv00731
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant:
MARK CAPOZZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piskanin v. Commonwealth of Pennsyvlania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00827
Plaintiff:
Michael John Piskanin, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsyvlania Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Michael Piskanin
as 16-8072
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Piskanin, Jr. v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 15-3917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, WEXFORD MEDICAL CONTRACTOR and others
Michael Piskanin, Jr. v. Tammy Ferguson, et al
as 15-3431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TAMMY FERGUSON, as Facility Mgr. SCI Benner, MICHAEL LEVY and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Michael Piskanin, Jr. v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 15-3337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and CLERK SUSSEX COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Piskanin, Jr. v. Tammy Ferguson, et al
as 15-2869
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FACILITY MGR TAMMY FERGUSON, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
