Cases 11 - 20 of 144
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12890
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOODMAN v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11780
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GOODMAN, BRANDON KOENIG-MESSER, RYAN LOIBL and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ward et al v. Brookside, Alabama, the town of et al
as 2:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Randall S Ward and Kimberly Boykin Ward
Defendant:
Brookside, Alabama, the town of, Michael Jones, Agent M.W. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pascal v. Brookside, Alabama, The Town of et al
as 2:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Anyl Pascal
Defendant:
Brookside, Alabama, The Town of, Michael Jones, James Savelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradshaw v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Bradshaw
Defendant:
Michael Jones and Alabama Carriers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Jones v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv15803
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20443
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20315
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18732
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17047
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
