Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jones #617568 v. MTU Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
MTU Correctional Facility and Unknown Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. Ingham County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
Ingham County Correctional Facility and Justin Hagerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
MTU Correctional Facility, Unknown Amsley and Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. People of the State of Michigan et al
as 1:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
People of the State of Michigan, Ingham County Jail and Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies), Michigan Department of Corrections, Justin Hagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Jones
as 1:2014cv00981
Defendant:
Robert Michael Jones
Plaintiff:
Amanda K. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jones #510112 v. Warren
as 1:2007cv00894
Petitioner:
Kyle Michael Jones #510112
Respondent:
Millicent Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
