Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Foley
as 1:2022cv02033
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Respondent:
Warden Keith Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Ohio, ex rel Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv02700
Defendant:
Aaron Michael Jones, Jovita Migdaris Cedeno Luna, Andrea Horvath and others
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio, ex rel Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jones et al v. GSV Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05681
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones and Tia Jones
Defendant:
GSV Transportation, Inc., GSV Trans., Inc., Victor Manuel Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Williams
as 3:2021cv01350
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Respondent:
Warden Mark K. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. USA
as 3:2020cv01665
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tran v. Township, Ohio et al
as 2:2014cv00968
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tran
Defendant:
Clinton Township, Ohio , Terrance Phillips , Joseph McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauman et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00224
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Bauman , Joyce McCumbers , Lorraine Nichols and others
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
as 1:2014cv00014
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Respondent:
Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones, Sr. v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2013cv01047
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Abdul-Ali et al
as 1:2012cv02889
Plaintiff:
Albert L Jones
Defendant:
Harun Abdul-Ali , Michael Jones and Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
