Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Michael Lane v. John Rupert, et al
as 14-40977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. RUPERT, Individually & in his/her official capacity as Warden, LARRY S. DOLYE, Individually & in his/her official capacity as Assistant Warden, JEFF CATOE, Individually & in his/her official capacity as Assistant Warden and others
Michael Lane v. John Rupert, et al
as 14-40782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. RUPERT, PATRICK COPPER, FRANK HOKE and others
Lane v. Rupert et al
as 6:2014cv00397
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
John Rupert, Brad Livingston, Bill Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Rupert et al
as 6:2014cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
John A Rupert, Patrick Copper, Frank Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Rupert et al
as 6:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
John A Rupert, Larry S Dolye, Jeff Catoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Lane v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 13-20163
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Lane v. Thaler
as 4:2012cv01501
Petitioner:
Michael Lane
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Lane v. John Doe, et al
as 09-20429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Captain, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, JOSEPH G. HEJL, III, Jailer and others
Lyons v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv00927
Petitioner:
Michael Lane Lyons
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lane v. Harris Cty Med Dept, et al
as 06-20935
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRIS COUNTY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL SEAL and TRONG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
