Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lewellen v. Blanche
as 26-10312
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewellen
Defendant:
Todd Wallace Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Lewellen v. Garland
as 4:2025cv00030
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewellen
Defendant:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Holt, et al. v. Urban League of Portland, Inc., et al.
as 24-5017
Defendant:
URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND, INC., MICHAEL LEWELLEN, KARIS STOUDAMIRE-PHILLIPS and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HOLT and TRY EXCELLENCE, LLC
Holt, et al. v. Urban League of Portland, Inc., et al.
as 24-633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN HOLT, an individual and TRY EXCELLENCE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND, INC., Urban League of Portland, Inc. an Oregon Domestic non-profit corporation, NKENGE HARMON-JOHNSON, individually and as President and CEO of THE URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND, INC., MICHAEL LEWELLEN, individually and as Board Chairman of THE URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND, INC. and others
Holt v. Urban League of Portland, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00837
Plaintiff:
Steven Holt and Try Excellence, LLC
Defendant:
Urban League of Portland, Inc., Nkenge Harmon-Johnson, Michael Lewellen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Lewellen et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:12-dp-20842
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lewellen and Michael Lewellen
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Filing Error
as 1:2012cv00853
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lewellen and Michael Lewellen
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Inc., DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewellen et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20842
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lewellen and Michael Lewellen
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
